limitedDistribution · Industry Research
Payments in Retail: What Leaders Need to Know
Payment modernization is shifting from a back-office infrastructure project to a customer-facing product priority. According to KPMG, ISO 20022 is designed to.

Payment modernization is shifting from a back-office infrastructure project to a customer-facing product priority. According to KPMG, ISO 20022 is designed to improve interoperability, automation, and data quality across the payments ecosystem, which makes richer, more consistent payment data a foundation for faster and more reliable services. AOL.com reports that settlement speed and payment reliability are becoming product features rather than utility concerns, meaning buyers should evaluate payments platforms not only for processing capability, but for how directly they improve customer experience and operational certainty. Consumer behavior supports that shift. Retail Technology Innovation Hub reports, citing The Payments Association’s 2026 Consumer Behaviour Survey, that mobile wallets are now the main everyday payment method for 26% of UK consumers, matching contactless debit cards at 26%. The same survey found that 39% of consumers are most likely to try new payment methods if they offer better security. In practical terms, the best payments investments are those that combine interoperability, dependable settlement, wallet and contactless support, and visible security benefits.
Key Takeaways
- Payment modernization is becoming time-sensitive because regulatory, commercial, and consumer pressures are converging at once.
- Cash is becoming less of an everyday default, but it is not disappearing from the UK payments landscape.
- The second major trend is the shift from isolated payment methods to multi-rail payment infrastructure.
- Trend 3: Agentic commerce turns payments into machine-to-machine settlement The next major shift in digital payments is not just a faster checkout button or a new consumer wallet.
- Operationally, the shift toward higher-quality payment data changes where work happens inside the enterprise.
Payment modernization is becoming time-sensitive because regulatory, commercial, and consumer pressures are converging at once. According to KPMG, fully unstructured address data will no longer be allowed in international payments from November 2026, and KPMG describes that deadline as a strategic forcing function for banks and corporates to improve data quality, reduce friction, and strengthen resilience. That makes ISO 20022 readiness less of a back-office formatting project and more of an operational priority tied to cross-border payment reliability. At the same time, the scale of digital payments has made incremental inefficiency harder to ignore. AOL.com reports, citing the 2024 McKinsey Global Payments Report, that the payments industry processed 3.4 trillion transactions and generated $2.4 trillion in revenue in 2023. In a market operating at that volume, better data, automation, and orchestration can have material effects on cost, speed, exception handling, and customer experience. AOL.com also notes, citing the 2025 McKinsey Global Payments Report, that agentic commerce is expected to be a major force reshaping payments over the next five years, adding urgency for payment systems that can support more automated, intelligent transaction flows. Consumer expectations add a third reason to act now. Retail Technology Innovation Hub reports, citing The Payments Association’s 2026 Consumer Behaviour Survey, that 70% of Brits believe both cash and cashless payment options should remain available. Buyers therefore need modernization strategies that advance digital capability without narrowing payment choice. Cash is becoming less of an everyday default, but it is not disappearing from the UK payments landscape. According to Retail Technology Innovation Hub, citing The Payments Association’s 2026 Consumer Behaviour Survey, 70% of Brits say it is important that both cash and cashless payment options remain available. That finding points to a more nuanced shift than a simple move from notes and coins to digital-only commerce: consumers increasingly treat cash as a fallback that protects choice, inclusion and resilience, rather than as their primary way to pay. The usage data reinforces that split. Retail Technology Innovation Hub reports that 28% of surveyed consumers use cash at least weekly, while 40% use it less than monthly or never. At the same time, only 10% of UK consumers use cash as their primary everyday payment method. In practical terms, cash remains relevant enough that retailers, service providers and public-facing organisations cannot ignore it, even as fewer customers rely on it for routine transactions. The leading everyday methods are now digital and card-based. Mobile wallets are used as the main everyday payment method by 26% of UK consumers, matching contactless debit cards at 26%. That parity shows how quickly wallets have moved into mainstream behaviour, but it also underlines that the market is not converging around a single payment rail. Emma Banymandhub, CEO at The Payments Association, said UK payment habits are evolving quickly and not necessarily following the expected digital takeover trajectory. The trend, then, is hybrid payment expectation: consumers are adopting mobile and contactless tools, while still wanting cash access preserved for moments when digital payments are inconvenient, unavailable or unsuitable. Alongside that hybrid consumer expectation, the infrastructure behind payments is shifting from isolated payment methods to multi-rail payment infrastructure. Real-time settlement networks, digital wallets, QR systems, and local bank transfers did not evolve as one unified stack; they developed separately. The next phase is about making those rails interoperable so money can move across channels with less friction. According to AOL.com, this interoperability is becoming central because the future of payments depends on connecting real-time settlement, digital wallets, QR rails, and local bank transfer systems rather than treating them as separate options. That matters because payment speed is becoming a baseline expectation, not a premium feature. AOL.com reports that McKinsey estimates instant-payment transactions in the EU will rise from around 3 billion today to nearly 30 billion by 2028. That scale points to a market where instant settlement is no longer a niche banking capability; it becomes part of the default operating environment for merchants, platforms, and consumers. The same pattern is visible in QR adoption. QR codes have grown fastest in mobile-first markets such as India, Brazil, and Southeast Asia, where payment adoption outpaced legacy card infrastructure. But the deeper story is not QR alone. As Ran Hammer, Chief Business Officer at Orbs, put it in AOL.com, direct payment is the core adoption story, and emerging markets moved faster because they had no card infrastructure to protect. The result is a payments landscape where buyers should expect more hybrid models: real-time transfers, wallets, QR acceptance, bank-to-bank payments, and AI-enabled commerce working together. Alicia Kao, Managing Director of KuCoin, described the next decade as one defined by multi-rail infrastructure that combines real-time settlement, digital wallets, QR payments, local bank transfers, and AI-driven commerce. In practical terms, the winning payment systems will not be the ones tied to a single rail, but the ones that can route value across many rails reliably. The next major shift in digital payments is not just a faster checkout button or a new consumer wallet. It is the emergence of AI agents and machines as active payers. According to AOL.com, Michael Heinrich, CEO of 0G Labs, described the biggest payments shift over the next decade as a new payer: machines or AI agents rather than people using a new interface. That changes the design requirements for payment infrastructure because the transaction may be initiated, evaluated, and completed by software acting on behalf of a user, business, or workflow. AOL.com reports that the 2025 McKinsey Global Payments Report identifies agentic commerce as a major force reshaping payments over the next five years. In practical terms, this pushes payment systems toward verified machine identities, auditable transaction trails, and rules-based authorization. AOL.com notes that 0G Labs has built settlement infrastructure for AI agents in which each agent carries a verified digital identity and each transaction leaves an auditable record. Programmability is central to this model. AOL.com defines programmable conditions as payments that trigger automatically when a defined rule is met, without manual approval at the point of transaction. That could support machine-led purchasing, autonomous service consumption, or conditional settlement between software systems. It also raises the bar for uptime: AOL.com states that AI agents need around-the-clock payment availability because they cannot wait for next-day settlement windows or business-hours processing cycles. The result is a payments environment built less around human checkout sessions and more around continuous, automated settlement. As retail payments become more data-rich and compliance-driven, the operational bottleneck often shifts downstream into invoice validation, exception queues, and reconciliation. Stargo retail benchmarks show AI-backed vendor invoice validation lowered manual exception review hours by 29% across weekly processing cycles, while one retail deployment normalized 6,400 invoice pages per week and preserved same-day exception review. That matters as ISO 20022 pushes cleaner payment data and retailers maintain multiple payment options: faster rails only create value if back-office validation can keep pace.
Operational Impact
Operationally, the shift toward higher-quality payment data changes where work happens inside the enterprise. Instead of relying on banks or back-office teams to interpret incomplete or unstructured address fields after a payment is initiated, organizations need cleaner payee records before payment files leave ERP, treasury, procurement, or customer systems. According to KPMG, international payments have historically depended heavily on unstructured address data, contributing to inconsistency, manual intervention, weaker screening, and lower straight-through processing. That makes data governance, master-data ownership, and bank-format readiness practical operating issues rather than purely technical migration tasks. The immediate impact is likely to be felt in payment operations, compliance, and customer support. If payee and beneficiary data is not standardized, teams may see more repair queues, exception handling, rejected payments, and investigations. KPMG says inaction may lead to more friction, lower straight-through processing, higher repair volumes, and greater operational and compliance risk. For corporates, this means ISO 20022 and structured-data readiness should be treated as an operating-model change: ERP fields, treasury workflows, sanctions-screening inputs, vendor onboarding, and banking partner requirements all need to align. Fraud exposure also reinforces the need for stronger controls around payment execution and data quality. Retail Technology Innovation Hub reports, citing The Payments Association’s 2026 Consumer Behaviour Survey, that 20% of UK consumers said they had been a victim of at least one type of fraud in the last year, while card fraud was reported by 8% of all respondents. Even though 76% said they had not been a fraud victim in the past 12 months, the reported fraud levels show why payment operations cannot rely only on downstream remediation. Cleaner structured data, better validation at source, and clearer ownership of exception handling can reduce operational drag while supporting stronger screening and reconciliation.
What Buyers Should Evaluate
- Buyers should evaluate payment platforms on three practical dimensions: data readiness, availability, and trust. On data readiness, the key question is whether the provider can support ISO 20022 address requirements without creating a last-minute remediation burden. According to KPMG, banks and corporates will need to adopt hybrid or fully structured address formats for international payments, and fully unstructured data will not remain viable beyond November 2026. That makes address-data capture, validation, enrichment, and migration tooling important buying criteria, not just back-office implementation details. KPMG also identifies fully structured addresses as the strategic end-state, so buyers should ask whether a vendor’s roadmap moves beyond minimum compliance toward cleaner, more reusable payment data. Availability is the second filter. AOL.com reports that AI agents require around-the-clock payment availability because they cannot wait for next-day settlement windows or business-hours processing cycles. Buyers expecting agentic commerce, automated procurement, embedded finance, or machine-triggered payments should therefore test whether a provider can support continuous payment initiation, monitoring, exception handling, and settlement workflows rather than relying on batch-based operating assumptions. The third evaluation area is customer confidence. Retail Technology Innovation Hub, citing The Payments Association’s 2026 Consumer Behaviour Survey, found that 39% of consumers are most likely to try new payment methods if they offer better security. It also reports that for high value purchases, security and buyer protection outweigh convenience and rewards. Buyers should therefore compare fraud controls, dispute processes, authentication options, buyer-protection messaging, and user-facing transparency alongside cost and conversion metrics. In practice, the strongest providers will combine compliance depth, 24/7 operational resilience, and visible security protections. Buyers should avoid treating these as separate requirements: structured data improves control, continuous availability supports new automated use cases, and strong protection features make customers more willing to adopt new ways to pay.
Definitions
ISO 20022: According to KPMG, ISO 20022 is designed to improve interoperability, automation, and data quality across the payments ecosystem. Fully structured addresses: KPMG defines fully structured addresses as address information presented in a clearly structured format. Hybrid addresses: KPMG describes hybrid addresses as an approach that structures key address information while allowing remaining details to appear in limited free text. Programmable conditions: AOL.com reports that programmable conditions are payments that trigger automatically when a defined rule is met, without manual approval at the point of transaction.
FAQ
FAQ Q: What changes for international payments in November 2026? A: According to KPMG, fully unstructured address data will no longer be allowed in international payments from November 2026. That makes address formatting a practical compliance and data-quality issue, not just a back-office detail. Q: What is a fully structured address in payments data? A: KPMG defines fully structured addresses as address information presented in a clearly structured format. In practice, this means payment systems need to capture address elements in defined fields rather than relying on one open text line. Q: What is a hybrid address? A: KPMG describes hybrid addresses as a format that structures key address information while allowing remaining detail in limited free text. This can help organizations move toward structured data while still accommodating address details that may not fit neatly into every predefined field. Q: What are programmable conditions in digital payments? A: AOL.com reports that programmable conditions are payments that trigger automatically when a defined rule is met, without manual approval at the point of transaction. The key idea is that the payment action is linked to a rule or condition rather than a manual step at the moment the transaction occurs. Q: What makes consumers more willing to try new payment methods? A: Retail Technology Innovation Hub reports, citing The Payments Association’s 2026 Consumer Behaviour Survey, that 39% of consumers are most likely to try new payment methods if they offer better security. That suggests adoption depends not only on novelty or speed, but also on whether users believe the method protects them. Q: Do consumers prioritize convenience for high-value purchases? A: Not necessarily. Retail Technology Innovation Hub, citing The Payments Association’s 2026 Consumer Behaviour Survey, found that for high value purchases, security and buyer protection outweigh convenience and rewards as considerations. Payment experiences for larger transactions therefore need to emphasize trust, protection, and clear safeguards, not only friction reduction.
Stargo insight: Payment speed raises the bar for retail invoice operations
As retail payments become more data-rich and compliance-driven, the operational bottleneck often shifts downstream into invoice validation, exception queues, and reconciliation. Stargo retail benchmarks show AI-backed vendor invoice validation lowered manual exception review hours by 29% across weekly processing cycles, while one retail deployment normalized 6,400 invoice pages per week and preserved same-day exception review. That matters as ISO 20022 pushes cleaner payment data and retailers maintain multiple payment options: faster rails only create value if back-office validation can keep pace.
Related guides: Financial Services Trends for Retail, Digital Health in Retail: AI, Screening, and Customer Pathways.
More from the News Room
View allWe are publishing more related coverage here soon. Explore the full News Room for the latest articles.
See ROI in 12 weeks
See where enterprise data is slowing operations down.
Estimate the manual effort, delays, and leakage hidden across your current workflow before you automate it.